I have heard this question asked in response to the argument for evolution. This question pisses me off so completely with its blatant ignorance, that I am compelled to have an answer for it.
4.
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes?Easy: There wasn't one day in the history of evolution where all the apes just turned into homo sapiens. And the
evolution of a new species from an existing one does
not necessarily mean the extinction of the old one. That's not
how evolution works. As certain types of apes evolved - really just developed different genetic mutations - the ones with teh favorable genetic changes were more able to survive, and therefore, to breed. Homo Sapiens, and before him,
Homo Erectus, and before him,
Australopithecus (and so on) all had evolutionary advantages that took them away from the rain forests and heavily wooded areas where apes and monkeys thrive. They developed the ability to walk upright - they key to their exit from the forest. There are many species of ape and monkey varieties, including us. The other ones just didn't develop the way we did. They were "genetically content" to remain in the forest. Why do you think there are so many different species on the planet? Because God put them there? Oh yeah, I forgot. Just like the
"dinosaur bones" he put there to test our faith.
An analogy: If you one day decided to move away from your family to live in a new city far away and grew up to be a completely different person than you are now, that doesn't mean that your family back home has to die out.
Question number 4 is the kind of idiotic,
narrow-minded response to evolutionary theory that I so abhor. It smacks of the cretinous thought processes of those who deal only in black and white, right or wrong, good and evil. It's that kind of logic that gets
a species like ours into trouble - like the kind of trouble we're in right now as we live in our decaying American Empire ruled by such dogmatic and frankly foolish thought.
I think the more appropriate question to ask would be, "If we humans are so smart, why are we still dying of starvation, raping the environment, and killing each other over fossil fuels?"
Why don't you check out some
reference material for my argument.
But don't go away just yet, watch for what this goofball

is doing in
New Mexico on my birthday.
And be sure to look into the works of one of my all-time heroes, a man truly dedicated to a life of reason.
Bertrand Russel. I think his work, especially
Why I am Not a Christian is particularly applicable to the debate over evolution and the cosmic unimportance of humanity.